Training Materials Books Articles
Real Estate - Construction
Articles

DESIGN BUILD: How To Do It
Sign-Up to the Construction Group


Gordon Hunt
, Esq.
Hunt Ortmann, Blasco, Palffy & Rossell, Inc., A Professional Corp.

INDEX:
Click on a topic to see the information!
Sponsors

1.  Introduction
2.  Strategic Facility Planning
3.  Request For Qualifications (Rfq) 
4.  Qualifications Statements
5.  Request For Proposals
6.  Proposal Submission And Evaluation
7.  Contract Award
8.  Documents And Construction
9.  Selection And Evaluation Process
10. Conclusion

DISCLAIMER

Prevent Workplace Harassment!
To receive training materials developed by a top labor firm and their fortune 500 clients
that will help your managers and employees prevent workplace harassment,
Click Here

Shop at Amazon.com

1. INTRODUCTION

In two prior editions of "Los Angeles CSI", the author discussed what the design-build delivery system consisted of and the advantages and disadvantages of the use of design-build and the types of projects where it might be considered.

The purpose of this article is to describe generally the process in implementing a design-build delivery system. The delivery steps and time frames for a design-build project are described herein in very general terms. Note, each project is unique and therefore the time required for each step in the process can vary considerably.

2. STRATEGIC FACILITY PLANNING

The first thing that must be performed by an owner is an analysis of its current and future facility requirements to determine an appropriate plan for the development of the owners facility. During that planning stage, the owner must establish a "program definition", that is, the needs that the owner has with regard to the size of the facility, the performance of the facility, the finish requirements and the applicable codes and regulatory standards that are applicable to the facility. These requirements are defined in and set forth in a "Request for Qualification" ("RFQ") either by the owner's staff or by an outside consultant who is thoroughly familiar with the process of design-build.

3. REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ)

The owner then issues a request for qualifications which sets forth in detail the requirements that any potential bidder for the project must have. This is prepared either by the owner's in-house staff or by an outside consultant. The owner must establish in detail the experience qualifications, the licensing qualifications, bonding requirements and other important criteria must be established and set forth in the RFQ.

4. QUALIFICATIONS STATEMENTS
The owner then advertises the project and the potential firms desiring to qualify for the project submit their qualifications statements in response to the RFQ. Those qualifications statements are reviewed in detail by the owner's team and generally the owner narrows the bidders down to somewhere between three and five of the most qualified firms.
5. REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS
Once the owner has narrowed the field down to the most qualified firms consisting of three to five firms, the owner sends to those firms a design and cost proposal in the form of a "Request for Proposal" ("RFP"). The owner should place in the RFP, the project's design criteria, information relating to the site where the project is to be constructed, the type of contractual arrangement that the owner will be using and a detailed procedure detailing how the owner is going to select the successful candidate for the project. The owner should set forth the essential requirements of the project.
6. PROPOSAL SUBMISSION AND EVALUATION
Once the proposals are received by the owner, the owner then evaluates the proposals received on the basis of various factors, including but not limited to, the quality of the design, the price to be charged, the time for performance and other factors which the owner has set forth in its RFP. Before making the final award, the bidders may be called in by the owner to make an oral presentation in addition to their written presentation.
7. CONTRACT AWARD
After having carefully evaluated the proposals received, the owner then selects the appropriate entity with whom it intends to award the contract.
8. DOCUMENTS AND CONSTRUCTION
The successful design-build contractor then proceeds with completion of the design documents for all elements of the project. During that process, the owner is deeply involved in reviewing the design documents as they proceed in relationship to the owner's budget and the constructability of the project. Once the design documents have been completed, then construction commences. The construction proceeds as in any normal construction project and in some cases where "fast track" is employed, construction proceeds after various phases of the design are completed, but prior to completion of the entire group of construction documents. During both the design phase and the construction phase, the owner makes progress payments to the design-builder as set forth in the contract documents.
9. SELECTION AND EVALUATION PROCESS

As noted above, prior to contract award, the owner must review and evaluate the proposals received from the various bidders. There are various procedures available to an owner in evaluating the successful bidder.

a. Weighted Criteria

One of the most common ways is what is commonly referred to as "weighted criteria". Under this system, after the proposed design-build contractors have submitted their proposals, the owner gives the successful companies the final requirements for submittal of a qualitative proposal as noted above. That proposal should set forth in detail the proposers management plan, experience, design solution and other issues relating to quality and, of course, price. The owner establishes a point rating for qualitative factors and for price. For example, with regard to qualitative and design factors, the owner may give a weight of 60 points and price a weight of 40 points. The design proposals and the price are submitted in separately sealed envelopes. The owner reviews each proposal and, as noted above, may then hear oral presentations from each of the proposed contractors. The owner then assigns points on a scoring matrix based upon the foregoing weight criteria. Generally, the owner weighs the design and qualitative criteria before the price envelopes are reviewed. This is done in order to ensure that the owner's decision is not overly influenced by the price proposal. The maximum price points are assigned to the lowest dollar bid once the qualitative and design criteria points are added to the price points, then the high total points determines the award.

b. Fixed Budget/Best Design Process

Another method to do the selection and evaluation process is the "fixed budget/best design" process. In that scenario, the contract price is established by the owner and stated in the RFP. Based upon that price, the proposed bidders submit their qualitative proposals. Again, oral presentations may be made and the owner uses its evaluation criteria to score the proposal.

c. Meets Criteria/Low Bid Process

Another process is a process known as the "meets criteria/low bid" process. In this process, the RFP and the criteria for design allow very little creativity in the design process. The owner in this situation provides a very specific outline or conceptual design as part of the design criteria package. Proposals are solicited from the firms who are qualified through the evaluation process and the proposals are evaluated based upon their ability to meet the design criteria and the award is made to the low bidder.

10. CONCLUSION
The foregoing merely sets forth a broad outline of the procedures to be used in a design-build process. It is submitted to give the reader a basic overview so that various steps described above can be elaborated upon in the documentation and implementation of the design-build process.
DISCLAIMER: This discussion is general in nature and is not intended to and does not create a lawyer/client relationship. This discussion should in no way be relied upon or construed as legal advice, particularly since most legal outcomes are highly dependent on the facts of a particular case or situation. This discussion is provided on the condition that it cannot be referred to or quoted in any legal proceeding; if this condition is unacceptable to you, immediately delete this email and do not keep a copy of it in any form. The reader or recipient is strongly urged to consult with a lawyer for legal advice on these matters. Any reliance on the discussion information by someone who has not entered into a written retainer agreement with the lawyer providing the discussion information is at the reader's or recipient's own risk.

* MCLE * MCLE * MCLE *

  1. Legal Elite Online, LLC is a State Bar of California approved provider of continuing legal education.
    Provider number: 09777
  2. To receive up to 3 hours of MCLE credit for this topic, reply to this email or send an email to: stacy@legalelite.com and include your name and bar number..
  3. To receive more participatory MCLE Credit via email, send us an email and let us know how many credits you need and what topics interest you.