|
|
| Real
Estate - Construction
wwwwwArticles |
|
DELAYS:
THE CURSE OF CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS
|
|
|
| A.
INTRODUCTION |
|
Delays on construction
projects are as vexing as they are misunderstood. A delay claim
can be the riskiest, most difficult, and most expensive of any claim
on a construction project. Both owners and contractors fear delays
so when one arises, the owner and contractor immediately start the
blame game and forsake any effort to understand and properly manage
the delay.
A proper understanding
of delays starts with two key words: cause and effect.
The cause of the event will determine who is responsible for any
resulting delay, and the effect of the event will determine whether
it actually causes a delay for which contract relief is available.
The owner and contractor seem to forget that an event is necessary
to cause a delay and that the event must actually cause the delay.
The event can be active or passive, act or omission, but something
must happen or not happen to cause a delay.
|
B. 3
TYPES OF DELAYS & TIME EXTENSIONS
Return
to Top |
|
The types of
delay fit into 3 broad categories:
(1) Inexcusable
or contractor-caused delays (the contractor is responsible
for the delay),
(2) "Compensable"
or owner-caused delays (the owner is responsible for the delay),
and
(3) Excusable
delays ( for which neither the contractor nor the owner are
responsible).
The type of
delay, and the party contractually responsible for the delay, determine
whether a time extension is available and which party, if either,
is liable to the other for the cost of the delay.
(1) Inexcusable
delay: contractor is not entitled to a time extension and
is liable for the owner's delay costs. Those costs can be either
the owner's actual delay damages or liquidated damages, as specified
by contract.
(2) Compensable
delay: contractor is entitled to a time extension and the
owner is liable for the contractor's delay costs.
(3) Excusable
delay: the contractor is entitled to a time extension but
neither the owner nor the contractor is liable to the other for
delay costs, and each party must absorb its own costs of the delay.
Responsibility
for delays is determined by the type of delay and by the contract.
The contract can shift the risk, usually to the contractor, for
delays that otherwise would not factually or logically be that particular
party's responsibility. Typical contract clauses such as the changes
clause, Force Majeure/excusable delay clause, termination clause,
suspension of work clause, differing site condition clause, no-pay-for-delay
clause, or a clause specifying scheduling requirements can allocate
risk of delays of different types to a particular party.
|
C. DELAY
ON A PROJECT'S "CRITICAL PATH"
Return
to Top |
|
To actually
delay the project, the delay must occur to an activity on the project's
"critical path," which is a series of activities that cannot be
compressed between now and the end of the project.
If the delay
occurs to an activity not on the critical path, that activity is
delayed but the project is not. However, the critical path routinely
shifts from one sequence of activities to another during the course
of a project. That shift is the product of the inherently fluid
nature of a construction project and the adjustment of the original
schedule to reflect the reality of the project as it is being built.
An activity
that was delayed but was not on the critical path at the time of
the delay may become critical when the critical path shifts to the
sequence of activities of which the delayed activity is a part.
Sophisticated critical path scheduling techniques are capable of
identifying and tracking the critical path as it shifts from one
sequence of activities to another, but few if any construction contracts
provide an explicit procedure for retroactively recognizing a delay
to an activity that was not on the critical path at the time of
the delay but later becomes critical when the critical path shifts
to its sequence of activities.
|
D. ACCELERATION:
WHO'S RESPONSIBLE FOR THE COSTS?
Return
to Top |
|
Acceleration
is the flip side of delay. Acceleration is increasing the pace of
the contractor's work by adding extra labor to compensate for a
delay, to accommodate additional work, or to finish the project
earlier than originally scheduled. The party liable for the cost
of acceleration is the party responsible for the underlying delay
and/or the party deciding to accelerate.
For
example, if the contractor voluntarily accelerates to overcome its
own delay, a delay for which the contractor is contractually responsible,
or an excusable delay, or to finish the project early, the contractor
is liable for its acceleration costs. If the owner directs the contractor
to accelerate to overcome the contractor's delay, or a delay for
which the contractor is contractually responsible, the terms of
the contract will determine which party is liable for the contractor's
acceleration costs. If the owner directs the contractor to accelerate
to overcome the owner's delay, or a delay for which the owner is
contractually responsible, the owner is liable for the contractor's
acceleration costs. If the owner directs the contractor to accelerate
to compensate for an excusable delay or to finish the project early,
the owner is liable for the contractor's acceleration costs.
Constructive
acceleration occurs when:
(1) an excusable
delay exists,
(2) the contractor
requests a time extension,
(3) either
the owner denies the time extension or the owner impliedly directs,
without a specific order, that the contractor should accelerate
(such as by the owner's failure to act on the contractor's request
for a time extension within a reasonable time), and
(4) the contractor
accelerates in response to the owner's implied direction.
|
|
|
|
YADDA,
YADDA, YADDA
1. For more
information go to http://www.legalelite.com/index.htm
2. If you need
help or have a comment, please E-mail us at
questions@legalelite.com.
3. To STOP receiving
the practice pointers, insights, forms and
clauses from the Legal Elite, please go to
the
UNSUBCRIBE page.
|
|
*
MCLE * MCLE * MCLE *
*PROVIDER: Legal
Elite Online, LLC
Provider has been approved by the State Bar of California as a continuing
legal education provider.
*SPONSOR: Legal
Elite Online, LLC
MCLE INFO:
click here.
|
| DISCLAIMER:
This discussion is general in nature and is not intended to and does not create
a lawyer/client relationship. This discussion should in no way be relied upon
or construed as legal advice, particularly since most legal outcomes are highly
dependent on the facts of a particular case or situation. This discussion is provided
on the condition that it cannot be referred to or quoted in any legal proceeding;
if this condition is unacceptable to you, immediately delete this email and do
not keep a copy of it in any form. The reader or recipient is strongly urged to
consult with a lawyer for legal advice on these matters. Any reliance on the discussion
information by someone who has not entered into a written retainer agreement with
the lawyer providing the discussion information is at the reader's or recipient's
own risk. |
|